tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23648158755117989702024-03-13T19:25:08.809-07:00The Pink PillBauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.comBlogger23125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-2558667595040177102012-09-29T02:43:00.001-07:002012-09-29T02:43:41.737-07:00Greek police send crime victims to neo-Nazi 'protectors'The latest popular trend these days on the internet is to compare the state Greece is in today with that of Germany during the days of the Weimer Republic.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Greece's far-right reactionary, fascist party, Golden Dawn, is increasingly assuming the role of law enforcement officers on the streets of the bankrupt country, with evidence that Athenians are being openly directed by police to seek help from the neo-Nazi group,<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/28/greek-police-victims-neo-nazi"> analysts, activists and lawyers say</a>. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-8609861771385420202012-09-28T09:14:00.003-07:002012-09-28T09:14:49.105-07:00The Socialists are at it again. <i><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/28/us-france-budget-idUSBRE88R0AK20120928"><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px;">(Reuters) - Socialist President Francois Hollande unveiled higher levies on business and a 75-percent tax for the super-rich on Friday in a 2013 budget aimed at showing </span><span style="color: #006e97; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans;"><span style="background-color: white; cursor: pointer; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px; outline-color: initial; outline-width: initial;">France</span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px;"> has the fiscal rigor to remain at the core of the euro zone.</span></a></i><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px;"><i><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/28/us-france-budget-idUSBRE88R0AK20120928"><br /></a></i></span>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><i><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/28/us-france-budget-idUSBRE88R0AK20120928">France says, “Soak the rich!”</a></i></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><i><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/28/us-france-budget-idUSBRE88R0AK20120928"><br /></a></i></span>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><i><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/28/us-france-budget-idUSBRE88R0AK20120928">Rich say, “Au revoir!”</a></i></span></span>Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-87862078200693999552012-09-27T15:07:00.003-07:002012-09-27T15:07:32.840-07:00The nutty yahoo strikes again.<span style="color: maroon; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><br /></span>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/CqxQ1YLe5dU?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NckcTHcR66o/UGTN1CwvCMI/AAAAAAAAABA/OQcSZU4gxBU/s1600/1348770208367.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NckcTHcR66o/UGTN1CwvCMI/AAAAAAAAABA/OQcSZU4gxBU/s1600/1348770208367.png" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: #f0e0d6;"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">We cannot permit Iran to get a hold of the latest Acme catalog! The survival of the roadrunner race is at stake!</span><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">...</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Vn9V-ZXDcgU/UGTN-xr9g6I/AAAAAAAAABI/GH2HW639k1c/s1600/1348771295837.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="210" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Vn9V-ZXDcgU/UGTN-xr9g6I/AAAAAAAAABI/GH2HW639k1c/s320/1348771295837.jpg" width="320" /></a></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-7001999907445410262012-09-27T12:32:00.002-07:002012-09-27T14:01:40.931-07:00Communist Goals (1963) II. Comments<br />
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>While scurrying throughout the internet, I came across a list of the goals of the Communist movement, Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>I’m not so sure about the sources, but every single goal sounds familiar, and seems to be related one way or the other to cultural Marxism.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<a href="http://the-pink-pill.blogspot.ro/2012/09/communist-goals-1963.html" rel="nofollow" style="text-decoration: none;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>http://the-pink-pill.blogspot.ro/2012/09/communist-goals-1963.html</b></span></a></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>Looking at that list you kinda have to think the Soviet Union really won the cold war and we have been substituted like some Orwellian version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. The stasi and KGB did infiltrate heavily. Such a busy band of merry reds.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>In the past I’ve asked myself why does the left-wing want to accept gays? I thought they would have killed people like that in Soviet Russia.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>Russia isn’t very religious. I know that sometimes even without a religion people still hate gays but that could be a factor. Or maybe, just maybe… bare with me… communism is itself a religion</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>Do you think North Korea isn’t religious?</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>Communism in Russia looks more like a successor to Tsarism than anything. Just like communism in China looks like a strange dynasty. Just like communism in Latin America is often explicitly religious, what with Revolutionary Theology and the get go.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>Statheism, Communism and the Revolution were their religion.<br />The Communists were against it because it was seen as a form of “bourgeois decadence”, even thought they had homosexuals in their countries. They wanted to create a new man, Homo Sovieticus, that will be born, live, work, breed and bleed for the Revolution.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>I’m not saying ‘durp, not real communists’, since I don’t think communism is viable on a national scale, and it’s impossible to try it without an authoritarian state enforcing it. I’m just saying that it’s not like communism swept away history or society or culture or religion anywhere it takes power. It just bends it slightly.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>As for the gays? They are a good scapegoat to blame for the ills of society. Many gays and feminists are the useful idiots for cultural Marxism, without even knowing it. It is in their benefit for us to blame gays, politicians, Jews and whatever. While I doubt there is still a Marxist conspiracy, I do believe that their cultural memes have spread and mutated. F*** man, I’m a homosexual, and scared of this dangerous ideology. We need to return to the principals of classical liberalism, and start our own march through the institutions, in the hopes of turning the tide.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>Because of this reason, and the fact that communism failed to take root in the West, we now have cultural Marxism.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>The first cultural Marxist blamed the failure of the Revolution on the proletariat, saying that they are still the slaves of their beliefs and culture. They sought to “liberate” them. Why do you think Hitler rose to power? It’s because the Frankfurt School pushed too many buttons. Hitler used the red scare, and the same dialectic of inevitable conflict to rise to power.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>It seems that history is about to repeat itself. Just replace the Red Scare with the Euro Scare, and you will witness how dozens of reactionary fascist movements will pop-up all over Europe, Russia and the Anglo-Sphere.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>It’s funny you know.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>The soviet union fell and broke apart yet this horrible bunch of evil bullshit that they started got a life of it’s own and continues under it’s own steam.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>Not only that but it’s coming into eastern europe to devour the very nations that came up with it like some kind of Frankenstein monster.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>It makes me wonder how many of the guys behind this Putin rubbed shoulders with and what he thought of them then and now.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>As for the gay thing?<br />They didn’t like gays. They thought that promoting homosexuality would help destroy the West.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>They’re just wrong. Acceptance of homosexuality is inevitable if people are free to associate, have free speech and a free press, and if consent is important in sexual relations.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>People can be right about one thing and wrong about another.</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #333333; line-height: 14pt; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-top: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b>Homosexuality isn’t that big a deal. Promiscuity on the other hand is.<br />The issue isn’t the romantic and sexual conduct between consenting adults, but promiscuity and unsafe sexual acts (anal sex for example). And no, I am against gay marriage. Not all of us are gullible.</b></span></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-81858395174300076642012-09-27T11:31:00.001-07:002012-09-27T11:31:38.490-07:00Communist Goals (1963)<span style="background-color: beige; text-align: -webkit-center;"><span style="color: red; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><i>Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35</i></b></span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: beige; text-align: -webkit-center;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><i>January 10, 1963</i></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: beige; text-align: -webkit-center;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><i>Current Communist Goals</i></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: beige; text-align: -webkit-center;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><i>EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA</i></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: beige; text-align: -webkit-center;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><i>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</i></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: beige; text-align: -webkit-center;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><i>Thursday, January 10, 1963</i></b></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>18. Gain control of all student newspapers.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Note by Webmaster: The Congressional Record back this far has not be digitized and posted on the Internet.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>It will probably be available at your nearest library that is a federal repository. Call them and ask them.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Your college library is probably a repository. This is an excellent source of government records.</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Another source are your Congress Critters. They should be more than happy to help you in this matter.</b></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<dl style="background-color: beige;">
<dt><center>
<span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Documentation</b></span></center>
</dt>
<dd><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b> </b></span></dd>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Webmaster Forest Glen Durland found the document in the library.</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Sources are listed below.</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>The quote starts on page 259.</b></span></dt>
<dd><hr />
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<dl>
<dt><b><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">Microfilm:</span></b></dt>
<dd><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b> </b></span></dd>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>California State University at San Jose</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Clark Library, Government Floor</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Phone (408)924-2770</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Microfilm</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Call Number: </b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>J</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>11</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>.R5</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Congressional Record, Vol. 109</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>88th Congress, 1st Session</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Appendix Pages A1-A2842</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Jan. 9-May 7, 1963</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Reel 12</b></span></dt>
</dl>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</dd></dl>
<div style="background-color: beige;">
</div>
<hr style="background-color: beige;" />
<span style="background-color: beige;"><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>The book was found in the off campus stacks, was ordered and checked. The quote below was checked against the original and is correct. The few errors in the copy from the Congressional Record are shown in [ ] .</b></span></span><div style="background-color: beige;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: beige;">
<span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>The quote starts on page 259.</b></span></div>
<dl style="background-color: beige;">
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>California State University at San Jose, Clark Library stacks call number:</b></span></dt>
<dt><i><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Naked Communist</b></span></i></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>HX</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>56</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>S55</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b> </b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Book title page:</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Skousen, W. Cleon. <i>Naked Communist</i></b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>Salt Lake City, Utah: Ensign Publishing Co.</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b>C. 1961 , 9th edition July 1961.</b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></dt>
<dt><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></dt>
<dt><a href="http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm"><b><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><i>http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm</i></span></b></a></dt>
</dl>
</div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-89423651854420958822012-09-27T11:19:00.000-07:002012-10-01T04:33:53.623-07:00VI. Androphilia, by Jack Malebranche <div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="line-height: 18px;"><b>Today I would like to present and alternative identity for homosexual men that are disgusted or disillusioned with the 'gay' identity and scene. That new alternative is that of an Androphile. Androphilia, or androsexuality, describes sexual and or romantic attraction to men and masculinity. </b></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="line-height: 18px;"><b><br /></b></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="line-height: 18px;"><b>The author, Jack Malebranche, real name Jack Donovan, argues that Androphilia is a rejection of the overloaded gay identity and a return to a discussion of homosexuality in terms of desire: a raw, apolitical sexual desire and the sexualized appreciation of masculinity as experienced by men.</b></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Dl5KIAyh6KA/UGSaC8O21wI/AAAAAAAAAAw/OmENpFduMMU/s1600/androphilia.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Dl5KIAyh6KA/UGSaC8O21wI/AAAAAAAAAAw/OmENpFduMMU/s400/androphilia.png" width="266" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">From the </span><a href="http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Androphilia.-a0167431879" style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">Free Library</a><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">:</span></span></h4>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia by Jack Malebranche Scapegoat Publishing 15608 S. New Century Drive, Gardena, CA 90248 9780976403586, $12.95 www.SCBDistributors.com</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 18px;">Jack Malebranche, the author of </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia: A Manifesto Rejecting the Gay Identity Reclaiming Masculinity</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 18px;">, is a bisexual man who prefers the company of and sexual relations with men--to the extent that he shares a long-term sexual and personal bond with another man. Yet he emphatically rejects the label "gay" because in today's culture the concept of "gay" has become intermingled with the concepts of feminization, abandoning masculinity, underachievement, and irresponsibility to the lengths of false victimhood.</span></div>
<span style="color: #660000;"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"></span><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span style="color: #660000;"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;"></span></span>
</span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;"><b>Androphilia: A Manifesto rejects the baggage-laden gay identity, and calls for humankind to recognize homosexual desire as apolitical.</b></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">
</span></span></div>
<div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">[He writes:]</span></div>
<blockquote style="color: #660000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic;">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Gay Party tells us that we homosexuals must band together to fight against high-school bullies, and to encourage kids to 'come out' and ghettoize themselves into little gay support groups where they can become conversant in Party dogma and avoid ever having to learn to deal effectively with their straight peers.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
...</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Gay Party insists we learn that we are victims of heterosexual oppression, and imagine that everyone is out to get us.</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 18px;">Malebranche prefers to substitute the word "androphile" for "gay" to describe himself, as he is an unrepentant advocate of the positive aspects of masculinity and male culture. </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia: A Manifesto</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 18px;"> does not attack or criticize those men (homosexual or heterosexual) who want to emulate effeminate qualities.</span></div>
<span style="color: #660000;"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"></span><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span style="color: #660000;"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"></span></span>
</span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><b>The crux of matter is not that men should be forced to be manly, but rather that the majority of them simply are manly, and should not be pressured by the gay culture to despise or reject their masculinity. Nor should a man's sexuality automatically define his hobbies, his politics, his interests, or who can or cannot be his friends. Though readers, regardless of gender or sexual orientation sexual orientation may not agree with all <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphilia</span> has to say, <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphilia</span> is invaluable for its core messages of being self-reliant and true to oneself, and for its frank discussion of whether "gay marriage" (as opposed to less radical measures like domestic partnerships, which are more likely to be successfully accepted nationwide) is needed at all to govern same-sex relationships incapable of producing children who are the biological offspring of both parents.</b></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">
</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">From </span><a href="http://www.heathenharvest.com/article.php?story=20070712051907760" style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px; text-decoration: none;">Heathen Harvest</a><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">:</span></span></h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 18px;">Jack Malebranche was certainly not looking to make friends within the worldwide and ever expanding “Gay Community” when he set about writing</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 18px;">. Much like the massive upheaval of Lutheranism, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 18px;">threatens to collapse the “Gay Identity” in upon itself revealing a new ideal by which to lead the homosexual community forward. Jack has come to liberate homosexual men from the trappings of sissydom by revealing the inherent but largely shunned masculinity in many homosexual males. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">Written like a man impassioned to rescue his people who have been led astray to wander a barren and desolate domain divorced from their very nature Jack rains down blow after blow on “Gay Culture” breaking away the definitions and inhibitions of social and political agendas revealing the raw and undiscovered force of the true homosexual male identity. It comes as no surprise that such an ambitious declaration would find a home with Scapegoat Publishing whose motto reads “Blame Us.” No doubt with a title like roots. </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia – A Manifesto “Rejecting The Gay Identity, Reclaiming Masculinity</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"> most of the magazines and publishers within the “Queer Press” would find Jack’s revolutionary ideas to be a threat to their investment in “Gay Culture.”</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span style="color: #660000;"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<b><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"></span></b></span>
</span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">So what is Jack really attempting with <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphilia</span> and is he successful? With so many books attempting to hand homosexual men theories on identity, community, sexuality, etc. is <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphilia</span> a revealing or relevant voice in the din of self help books and feel good declarations of homosexual elitism? Testifying as a man loving homosexual I am compelled to declare this as one of the most relevant books on the subject of homosexuality that I have ever read.</span></b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: white;"><b><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">
</span></b></span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: white;"><b><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></b></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: white;"><b><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">
</span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"></span></b></span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">Jack leads the reader on a journey buffered with historical and social references that trace the progression of attitudes and ideas about homosexuality and the men who participate in it from the glorified days of such masculine homosexual icons as Alexander the Great to the modern day gay ideal of female and feminine idealization. Through various approaches and angels Jack explores the historical / social progression of homosexuality becoming related to effeminate behavior and the eventual progression of homosexual males being defined as something “other” than their heterosexual male counterparts. This distinction has had devastating consequences leading homosexual males to become identified with anything but traditional masculinity in the rag tag rush to establish a new identity.</span></b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><b><span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">
</span></b></span>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: white;"><b><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></b></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: white;"><b><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">
</span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
As naturally masculine homosexual male I found Jack’s book to be the missing link in my own life journey. <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphilia</span> casts out a rescue rope to those of us floating in the ocean of “Gay Culture” adrift and alienated from the deification of femininity and the celebration of all things sissy and trivial. In order to break these stereotypes and liberate the queer community from these chains of self-imposed restriction Jack has had to deconstruct some of the highest held tenants of “Queer Culture” such as the myth that homosexuality is not a choice. Jack discusses how homosexual men in past centuries chose to marry women and have productive families whilst ignoring their homosexual impulses or else acting on them in secrecy. This proposition that homosexuals have choice as to whether they act upon such sexual impulses flies in the face of the “Queer” agenda yet no one can deny that having sex with anyone is indeed a choice driven by sexual impulse. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The book is filled with many such taboo ideas that threaten to deconstruct the current Gay Rights political agenda. Though some may see this as threatening I found the idea empowering that I choose to share my flesh with men rather than being victim to some uncontrollable influence of nurture or nature that leaves one with a sense of victimization. Another revealing discussion is the idea that queer men lack respect in the eyes of their heterosexual male counterparts because they have largely abandoned the ideals and responsibilities of manhood and masculinity thus not making them men in the eyes of other men who shoulder the burden of masculinity. Ideas such as these reveal painful revelations which if addressed could heal the rift and alienation felt by homosexual from society and mainstream culture.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The core theory of the book is the proposition of a new identity titled “Androphile” which describes a male love of the masculine. This <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphile</span>is in many ways the counter image of the modern “Fag”. The <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphile</span>enjoys the company of his fellow man, enjoys traditionally male pursuits and forms of recreation and as an extension of this enjoyment of the masculine his sexuality is also indulged by enjoying the fraternal sexual company of his fellow man. This new “Androphile” identity is exactly what has been missing in the modern gay culture whose only emulation of the masculine is embodied in such staged like productions as the Village People who fall far from an authentic representation of masculinity. Jack is careful not to dismiss the effeminate queer man but rather offers those who fall outside this stereotype a shelter. Jack acknowledges that though some queer men are inherently feminine somehow we have all become defined as such leaving no place in queer or mainstream culture for the masculine identified homosexual male.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
In addition to proposing some very compelling ideas and arguments Jack also offers suggestions for homosexual men looking to deprogram their queer / sissy identity and begin exploring their inherent masculine nature. The author discusses the roots of the “queer inferiority” complex and offers encouraging ideas on how to find your niche amongst other men regardless of their sexual orientation. By laying claim to traditional masculine roles, ideals, and responsibilities masculine inclined homosexual men might find that missing something that gay culture threw in the gutter as they stampeded into the mainstream spotlight.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
I found <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphilia</span> to be a gripping read. The book flows easily between chapters and the progression is nicely structured leading from one conclusion to another. Concise is another word which applies to the book. Wrapping up at a mere one hundred and forty- three pages <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphilia</span> is anything but excessive. The author trims the fat and delivers his ideas without much waste of the readers time. Though the book is rather short the ideas inside may take the reader some time to digest. Some of the suggestions where so foreign to me I had to set the book aside for a week at a time in order to fully ponder the suggestions and allow my own thinking to readjust to the new ideas. At times I found myself rejecting some of the ideas the author suggesting only to later find myself agreeing after my initial defenses relaxed. And that is nothing to say about the discussions this books has spurred amidst me and my friends.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
Lastly, this book is a worthwhile read not only for homosexual men but for any man. It is the first discussion about masculinity of its nature I have ever read and it left me wondering what we have yet to discover about ourselves as men in light of the feminist movement which has published countless books addressing the reality of womanhood.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
I thank Jack for going out on such a tenuous limb to write and publish this much needed manifesto and I encourage all the men and women reading this to purchase a copy and allow your hard set ideas about masculinity and self under go the trial of <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphilia</span>! For very dismissive or denouncing review this book might receive in the mainstream queer press it is sure to be held in high regard by the many refugees of “Queer Culture.”</div>
</span></b></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: small;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">Matt Moody in the </span><a href="http://www.gaylesbiantimes.com/?id=10912" style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px; text-decoration: none;">Gay and Lesbian Times</a><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">:</span></span></h3>
<blockquote style="background-color: white;">
<div style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">“I am not gay.” Jack Malebranche’s first four words hooked me from the start – an epiphany, a rallying call, a simple declarative statement that revoked the emasculating and encapsulating power of the word, “gay.”</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"></span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">As a manifesto, <span style="font-style: italic;">Malebranche’s Androphilia: A Manifesto Rejecting the Gay Identity Reclaiming Masculinity</span> asserts a point of view I’ve long shared which is that despite my personal sexual preferences, I really have very little in common with so-called gay culture – a culture broadcasted, controlled, and encouraged by the Gay Party, a radically leftist group of past counter-cultural rebels who have now congregated into a truly corporate machine, rolling dollar after dollar into special interest legislation bent in one direction, not open to dissent or self-reflection. It’s a party so desperate for normalcy that it ignores the many problems plaguing its own members – a disparate hodgepodge of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender, and myriad other confusing neo-liberal labels too complex and arbitrary to list, a party so hungry for acceptance and inclusion that it consistently seeks approval and acknowledgement from a society that would rather see it disappear.</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<span style="color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;"></span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia as a concept is a rebuttal of the word gay and everything it connotes and promotes. Per Malebranche, “the word gay describes a whole cultural and political movement that promotes anti-male feminism, victim mentality, and leftist politics … gays stand for the notion that sexuality engenders ethnicity and complete social identity.”</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<span style="color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;"></span></span>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia, on the other hand, is at once a rejection of the gay identity and its clichéd effeminate stereotype, and reclamation of masculinity via the quest for an authentic masculine identity. Not the uber-queer choose-your-own-form-of-masculine definition, which is often just another way to say effeminate, and not the hyper-masculine invention by leather men and bears which is just another form of drag, but a qualified masculinity based on physical, essential, and cultural elements outlined in the text.</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; font-style: italic; line-height: 18px;">
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
So the book addresses how reclaiming a masculine identity is necessary to counteract the negative and effeminizing forces of modern gay culture. It promotes a masculine ideal of self-reliance, independence, and personal responsibility through achievement, respect, and integrity. Best of all, the author suggests that men should build alliances with other men, including heterosexual men. <span style="font-style: italic;">Androphile</span> men should develop strong relationships with heterosexual men, not just others with the same preference. Because the fact of the matter is, the forces emasculating gay men are doing the same to straight men. If you disagree, think about the political-correctness of metrosexuality and other gender blending in today’s popular culture. The author’s belief is that only through building an alliance with other masculine men will the tide turn in the favor of reclaiming and establishing a masculine identity again, for all men, yet especially for men who love or prefer men –<span style="font-style: italic;">androphiles</span>.</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
In this age of squalid political correctness, to speak out as a homosexual or<span style="font-style: italic;">androphile </span>against organizations such as the HRC or GLAAD could be equivocated by some as biting the hand that feeds you. However, the named powerful organizations do so little to counteract the negative characteristics and qualities of the loosely knit and contrived communities they represent.</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
GLAAD glorifies effeminate affectations and representations of gay men as positive developments in the mainstream media. They aren’t. Effeminate gay men on television are like blackface actors in southern theaters during segregation. They do nothing but promote an emasculating stereotype that continues to further weaken gay men in the eyes of heterosexual men. HRC gushes about its achievements in corporations and political campaigns. Each organization touts ephemeral qualities of inclusion, diversity, and the intoxicating idea of equality. Yet anyone who speaks out against either organization out of a sense of pragmatism is castigated, shunned, or patronized for their dissent.</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
Republican homosexuals are treated as villains. Libertarians are scoffed at. Constitutionalists are trivialized. Anyone who doesn’t agree with a feminist perspective is ridiculed. Masculine-identified men are labeled as internally homophobic. But it is worse than that. The current gay “culture” fosters young adults into a world of designer drugs, materialism, body dysmorphia – bigorexia and anorexia, classism and a plethora of other social maladies.</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The community is, in actuality, a disaggregated and forced collection of people who frankly don’t really like each other that much. Nor should they. If you disagree, ask a lesbian how much she really likes going to a circuit party – and perhaps she could take the kids, too! Ask a military officer how comfortable he or she would feel on a Pride float. Proud of what? The GLBT alphabet soup with all of its anti-war Democrats? Or proud of their service to the country, which seems to matter to gays only if you reached veteran status and came out? Online profiles for horny gay men tout list after list of racial, HIV-status, age, money and political preferences. Gay bars are segregated along the same lines. Do we really have that much in common, or are we just pretending to?</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
The author studies and criticizes the rationale behind the research of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Heinrich_Ulrichs" style="color: #888888; text-decoration: none;">Karl Heinrich Ulrichs</a> and his <span style="font-style: italic;">urning</span> theory on homosexuality and argues instead that there should be a more libertarian approach to sexuality, the same approach that resulted in the decriminalization of sodomy laws in the Western world. Greek culture, Roman warriors, and other non-gay forms of male relationships are examined to contrast with the current anti-masculine gay sexuality.</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
Another critical point in the book is how men who disavow gay culture should also remove themselves from what he believes is a culture of victimization and being the underdog. He asserts that if someone defines themselves by their travails, they will never truly be free of them. Most GLBT people these days haven’t faced that much harassment, if any, so gay culture continues to promote a victim mentality even in those who have never been victims.</div>
</span><div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
Personally, the vindication I feel in reading this book is that finally, finally, another gay man is advocating what I’ve believed for years: the belief that men who admire or love men should be more responsible, not give into the effeminate gay cultural fad, avoid the personal, career, and social pitfalls common to those who live in a completely emasculated world, and build stronger ties with heterosexual men who share common interests.</div>
</span></span></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"> <span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">From </span><a href="http://www.jack-donovan.com/androphilia/androphilia-the-book/" style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px; text-decoration: none;">Jack's own website selling his book</a><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 18px;">:</span></span></h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white;">
<div style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">The word gay has never described mere homosexuality. Gay is a subculture, a slur, a set of gestures, a slang, a look, a posture, a parade, a rainbow flag, a film genre, a taste in music, a hairstyle, a marketing demographic, a bumper sticker, a political agenda and philosophical viewpoint. Gay is a pre-packaged, superficial persona—a lifestyle. It’s a sexual identity that has almost nothing to do with sexuality.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"></span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia is a rejection of the overloaded gay identity and a return to a discussion of homosexuality in terms of desire: a raw, apolitical sexual desire and the sexualized appreciation for masculinity as experienced by men. The gay sensibility is a near-oblivious embrace of a castrating slur, the nonstop celebration of an age-old, emasculating stigma applied to men who engaged in homosexual acts. Gays and radical queers imagine that they challenge the status quo, but in appropriating the stigma of effeminacy, they merely conform to and confirm long-established expectations. Men who love men have been paradoxically cast as the enemies of masculinity—slaves to the feminist pipe dream of a ‘gender-neutral’ (read: anti-male, pro-female) world.</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">
</span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;"></span></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">Androphilia is a manifesto full of truly dangerous ideas: that men can have sex with men and retain their manhood, that homosexuality can be about championing a masculine ideal rather than attacking it, and that the wicked, oppressive ‘construct of masculinity’ despised by the gay community could actually enrich and improve the lives of homosexual and bisexual men. Androphilia is for those men who never really bought what the gay community was selling; it’s a challenge to leave the gay world completely behind and to rejoin the world of men, unapologetically, as androphliles, but more importantly, as men.</span></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="color: #660000; line-height: 18px;">
</span></span></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: small;">The book, Androphilia, also has a </span><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Androphilia/39632351928" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: medium;">Facebook page.</a></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: small;"><div style="text-align: justify;">
There is also<a href="http://androphilia.blogspot.ro/2008/04/what-every-androphile-should-know-but.html"> a blog called Androphilia.</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/bio/">Jack's Bio.</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/bio/"></a><a href="http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/bio/">Jack's blog.</a></div>
</span></h3>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Source: <a href="http://redneckfag.blogspot.ro/p/androphilia.html?zx=6a57ae4693940755">http://redneckfag.blogspot.ro/p/androphilia.html?zx=6a57ae4693940755</a></span></b></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;"></span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #660000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;"></span></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-27001926827737775332012-09-26T16:31:00.001-07:002012-09-26T16:31:27.825-07:00A nutty yahoo.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/QSPkx4DqQl0?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-65662986689866642902012-09-26T15:50:00.001-07:002012-09-26T15:50:18.730-07:00Iran and the biased American mass media.<br />
<blockquote class="postMessage" id="m5772833">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">It's hard to believe any reporting on Ahmadinejad because their mass media is so hilariously bias.<br /><br />Israel needs to be wiped from the map comes from when they broadcast this<br /></span><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="quote">I think that the Israeli government is a fabricated government</span></span></blockquote>
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br />and<br /></span><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="quote">The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.</span></span></blockquote>
<span style="color: white;"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br />What they left out was this</span><br /></span><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="quote">...and I have talked about the solution. The solution is democracy. We have said allow Palestinian people to participate in a free and fair referendum to express their views. What we are saying only serves the cause of durable peace. We want durable peace in that part of the world. A durable peace will only come about with once the views of the people are met.</span></span><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="quote">>So we said that allow the people of Palestine to participate in a referendum to choose their desired government, and of course, for the war to come an end as well. Why are they refusing to allow this to go ahead? Even the Palestinian administration and government which has been elected by the people is being attacked on a daily basis, and its high-ranking officials are assassinated and arrested. Yesterday, the speaker of the Palestinian parliament was arrested, elected by the people, mind you. So how long can this go on?</span></span><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span class="quote">>We believe that this problem has to be dealt with fundamentally. I believe that the American government is blindly supporting this government of occupation. It should lift its support, allow the people to participate in free and fair elections. Whatever happens let it be. We will accept and go along. The result will be as you said earlier, sir.</span></span></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div>
<span class="quote" style="color: #789922;"><br /></span></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-48389397102790120982012-09-26T14:37:00.001-07:002012-09-26T14:37:48.746-07:00Israel Lobbyist suggests False Flag attack to start war with Iran<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/M84l19H68mk?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-74484771919492861792012-09-26T14:19:00.002-07:002012-09-26T14:21:52.980-07:00The United States of Europe.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://1.gvt0.com/vi/Jo_-KoBiBG0/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jo_-KoBiBG0&fs=1&source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jo_-KoBiBG0&fs=1&source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If you have seen the latest news, those bastards in Brussels are pushing for the creation of a Federal Government of a United States of Europe. Now, this in itself would not be a bad thing, if it weren't so left-leaning. But what if... what if... Both Europe, and the Union could be saved if all the center-right, right-wing and conservative parties united under one banner for personal responsibility, states-rights and capitalism? </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There is also the question of the creation of a new European nationalist movement, or a coalition of nationalist movements (besides the already existing ones).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Could this be the beginning of a new Great Republic? Or another failed Soviet state? </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
These are the center-right, right-wing, conservative and nationalist and EU-nationalist parties:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The National Party of Europe (NPE), The Alliance of European National Movements (AENM), EuroNat, European National Front, The Movement for European Reform, Newropeans, The European Federalist Party.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I would love to hear your opinion about this. I for one shudder at the thought of a Soviet European Union, but would welcome with open arms my new German overlords! </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Who knows, maybe we could teach the Yanks a thing or two about running a Federal Republic.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I think the Deutschlandlied is a more appropriate anthem for Europe. Oh boy, here we go again!<br />
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 19px;"><span lang="de" xml:lang="de"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="line-height: 19px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 19px;"><span lang="de" xml:lang="de"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 19px;"><span lang="de" xml:lang="de"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></span></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://1.gvt0.com/vi/_ccfMkZVbkk/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ccfMkZVbkk&fs=1&source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ccfMkZVbkk&fs=1&source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 19px;"><span lang="de" xml:lang="de"><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></span></span>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-11722390337703451152012-09-26T14:11:00.000-07:002012-09-26T14:11:44.622-07:00Hong Kong Billionaire Offers $65 Million To Any Man Who Can Woo His Gay Daughter <span style="background-color: white; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;">One of Hong Kong's wealthiest men has placed a "marriage bounty" on his lesbian daughter's head, offering nearly £40 million to the man who successfully woos her.</span><span style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><br /><br />Read more: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/cecil-chao-sze-tsungs-daughter-2012-9#ixzz27c2CtQEU" style="color: #003399; text-decoration: none;">http://www.businessinsider.com/cecil-chao-sze-tsungs-daughter-2012-9#ixzz27c2CtQEU</a></span><br style="background-color: #ffffee; color: maroon; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: #ffffee; color: maroon; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" />Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-25256035180312596042012-09-26T14:07:00.001-07:002012-09-26T14:07:12.791-07:00Critical theory and lulz.<br />
I bring lulz. I found an article which made me laugh. It is dubbed "The Racist Tapestry of Lord of the Rings!" by Lloyd Hart. God I love trolling of the highest order. Or at least... I hope he is a troll.<br />
<br />
http://www.thenoiseboard.com/index.php?showtopic=13688<br />
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-48470174715399525832012-09-26T14:05:00.003-07:002012-09-26T14:05:54.825-07:00Feminist related lulz.<br />
Is 'Opting Out' The New American Dream For Working Women?<br />
http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/09/12/is-opting-out-the-new-american-dream-for-working-women/<br />
<br />
But... Stay-at-Home Moms Report More Depression, Sadness, Anger<br />
http://www.gallup.com/poll/154685/stay-home-moms-report-depression-sadness-anger.aspx<br />
<br />
In other words, women who work want to stay at home, and women who stay at home want to work.<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
Before he died, Freud asked "What do women want?"<br />
<br />
The answer is, and always has been, "Whatever they don't have right now."<br />
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-508387784986099222012-09-26T14:01:00.002-07:002012-09-26T14:01:55.959-07:00Statheism defined.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/zxTJnjLkbk8?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.699219); color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;">she wants to eliminate death penalty </span></li>
<li><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.699219); color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;">but wants a growing armed forces to stamp out genocide, which is only achievable by killing people and some collateral damage to boot</span></li>
<li><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.699219); color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;">she respects a women's right to choose </span></li>
<li><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.699219); color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;">but not a right to choose smoking</span></li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><span style="line-height: 16px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><span style="line-height: 16px;">Ha, ha! This is what's wrong with the Left and Right in American politics, in a nutshell. I need a drink.</span></span></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-82557887663371214032012-09-26T13:44:00.000-07:002012-09-26T13:44:40.632-07:00Red Pill? Or religious conservative blue pill. Hurr Durr!Some author at the Red Pill report had this to say about gay marriage and cultural Marxism.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 19px; text-align: justify;"><i><b>Homosexuality is wrong. There, I said it. Call me intolerant, call me homophobic, call me a bigot. Call me whatever it is you like, but I said it and I’ll say it again. Homosexuality is wrong. Not only is it wrong, it’s the first major step being taken in the breakdown of this country and the fundamental ideas that it was built upon. In speaking about the truth of homosexuality, Pastor Scott Lively says, “Many people today will still say that they don’t support same-sex marriage, but very few will call it like it is and say that homosexuality is wrong.” If we cannot accept and prove the fact that homosexuality itself, is wrong, then how would we even begin show that same-sex marriage shouldn’t be? </b></i></span></blockquote>
<br />
Some people still think that they can fight cultural Marxism by fighting the groups that have been brainwashed the most by it. Some go so far to still confuse the degenerative ghetto culture of the LGBT community with homosexuality. Some go so far as to thinking that a fact of human biology found in probably less than 2 to 6 % of the human species is what is destroying society, and not feminism and divorce. Gay marriage is a symptom, but not the cause. No, he is not [insert leftist buzzword], he is just misguided and wrong.<br />
<br />
What I find ironic is the name of the site, the <a href="http://redpillreport.net/2012/08/11/homosexuality-and-its-distorted-reality/">"Red Pill" report</a>. That is a good one, LOL. I'll just repeat myself:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="background-color: white;"><b><i><br /><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">For
marriage to be saved, it is imperative for secular and religious
conservatives and traditionalists to forsake their old arguments and
use new ones. Instead of trying to return society in the past, they
must embrace the ""inevitability of history".</span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">In
other words, they must fight fire, with fire. Instead of using
dogmatic religious and political arguments, they must use secular and
scientific ones. Instead of using their resources "fighting
homosexuality", they must embrace the truth that
non-reproductive sexual behavior between adults exist. Marriage
should be seen as a cultural duty, as a reproductive imperative, but
at the same time embrace the merry band of misfits among them. The
homosexual could still be convinced to enter into such a union with a
lesbian woman, if he desires offspring. </span></span></i></b></span></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<br /></blockquote>
The rest of the article is just the usual "Oh lawdy Gawd and Jesus!" nonsense that got them in this trouble in the first place.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-23226878549616087442012-09-26T13:23:00.000-07:002012-09-26T13:45:43.125-07:00Protochronism and Fascism, my response to Aurini.<span style="color: white;">After forwarding an article about the statements of the Golden Dawn regarding eugenics, Aurini had this to say:</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/W828vzONzvM?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />
<b style="background-color: black;"><span style="color: white;"><br /></span></b>
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b style="background-color: black;">It is interesting to note the fact that both Fascism and Marxism have an almost similar dialectic based on the eternal and inevitable conflict (the protagonists vary between the two ideologies, e.g. class, race, nation, etc).</b></i></span><br />
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b style="background-color: black;"><br /></b></i></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>There are far many more stupid reactionary movements, and not all of them are based on pseudo-scientific nonsense, some are based on religious non-sense. </b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b style="background-color: black;"><span style="line-height: 16px; text-align: left;">Case in point, while the whole of Europe had Fascism and Nazism, based on the new myth of the Übermensch, myth "baked" by sociology, biology and history, a protochronistic canard that elevated the people as descendants of the noble savage of the past, the Aryan, the Antlantian, </span><span style="line-height: 16px; text-align: left;">the Dúnedain (the Middle Earth mythology seems to have been touched by this meme) , the reactionary right-wing movement in Romania was based on religion, the Christian ideal, a theocratic movement.</span></b></i></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b> It was viewed as being more dangerous, for it threatened the monarchy and the moderate dictatorship of Marshal Antonescu. </b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>The new movements in Europe are based on those failed movements of the past, neo-Nazism, Neo-Fascism, and while still allied with religious conservatives, they are not as volatile as the New Right movement of Romania, the brain child of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu's Legion of Archangel Michael. </b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>Protochronism (anglicized from the Romanian: Protocronism, from the Ancient Greek terms for first in time) is a Romanian term describing the tendency to ascribe, largely relying on questionable data and subjective interpretations, an idealised past to the country as a whole.</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>Although a Romanian term, it can be used to describe the new religions of the noble savage, the Aryan, the noble Pagan, the new religions of the blood.</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>While particularly prevalent during the communist regime of Nicolae Ceauşescu, its origin in Romanian scholarship dates back more than a century. </b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>The irony of thus is that while Ceausescu was a Stalinist in every sense of the word, he wanted to be independent form Moscow. After his speech against the Invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, the clandestine right-wing and nationalist movements began using the regime to further their own idea.</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>There is more to say about this, how Ceausescu saw himself as a new Prince of the Romanian Principalities, a new Medieval monarch who was chosen by Destiny to rule, and the paradox of having right-wing nationalists Communist party members feeding this mass delusion. But back the New Right movement.</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>After the revolution it became clear that the country is left-leaning. The EU is left-leaning, the so called conservative and nationalist party is left-leaning. </b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>The New Right became a new option. But, they are also a populist movement. To them the "Satanist Illuminati controlled West", the homosexuals and the atheists of the country are the scapegoats for the ills of the country.</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>The problem is so grave, that few see the danger. here in the Christian Orthodox Eastern Europe, we see the ancient Byzantine order, of the Church imposing its views on the state, and the state imposing its views on the Church, taking root again. In Russia we see this is the Alliance between the Church and Putin (it is interesting to note that both Putin and many priests are former KGB agents).</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>In Romania this fine line between Church and state is being challenged daily, And here comes the Theocratic New Right, whose ideology borrows from both the pseudo-scientific religion of the pagan Noble savage, but also from the Christian Identity of the past.</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>Both movements converge, If the Right in Europe does not challenge and resolve this infection, we could very well see the rebirth of Fascism, Nazism and the Legionarism in Europe. The politicians on the left are weak and corrupt, those on the right are weak and ignorant, while the movement grows.</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b> Aurini's YouTube video highlights this very well. The Skeptic community in Romania has a term for this populist ploy of blaming certain groups for the failure of the system. It is called the "Hermann Goering's technique", or "Göring's technique".</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b> The name comes form the quote on "War and the People": " Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b>Aurini talk about the dialectic of the Marxists that thrives on conflict between groups within and outside a country, but one must not forget that the same ploy is used by the Fascists.</b></i></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: black; line-height: 16px; text-align: left;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><b> If one reads history, and understands why Hitler rose to power, that is because the cultural Marxists began destabilizing the country culturally, while the communists socially. They thought that they could destroy the Weimer Republic, and pick up the shards of this desecated corpse. What they did not foresee was someone else using the same technique. Today, the European Union is the Weimer Republic. I hope history doesn't repeat itself.</b></i></span></span>Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-16597401866309582152012-09-26T13:05:00.000-07:002012-09-26T13:45:52.044-07:00V. How do we reverse the medal?To better understand the effective tactics of cultural Marxism, one must understand their dialectic.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/aBFsaA2-hSs?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div class="widget Text" id="Text1" style="background-color: #eeeecc; color: #333333; font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; margin-top: 4px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 13px; padding-right: 13px; padding-top: 0px; text-align: left; width: 468px;">
<div class="widget-content" style="margin-top: 0.5em;">
<strong><em>"Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism."</em></strong> - Catharine A. MacKinnon, <em>Toward a Feminist Theory of the State </em>(First Harvard University Press, 1989), p.10</div>
<div class="clear" style="clear: both;">
</div>
<span class="widget-item-control" style="float: right; height: 20px; margin-top: -20px; position: relative; z-index: 10;"></span><br />
<div class="clear" style="clear: both;">
</div>
</div>
<div class="widget Text" id="Text2" style="background-color: #eeeecc; color: #333333; font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; margin-top: 4px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 13px; padding-right: 13px; padding-top: 0px; text-align: left; width: 468px;">
<div class="widget-content" style="margin-top: 0.5em;">
<em><strong>"A world where men and women would be equal is easy to visualize, for that precisely is what the Soviet Revolution promised</strong>.<strong>" </strong>- </em>Simone de Beauvoir, <em>The Second Sex </em>(New York, Random House, 1952), p.806</div>
<div class="clear" style="clear: both;">
</div>
<span class="widget-item-control" style="float: right; height: 20px; margin-top: -20px; position: relative; z-index: 10;"></span><br />
<div class="clear" style="clear: both;">
</div>
</div>
<div class="widget Text" id="Text5" style="background-color: #eeeecc; color: #333333; font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; margin-top: 4px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 13px; padding-right: 13px; padding-top: 0px; text-align: left; width: 468px;">
<div class="widget-content" style="margin-top: 0.5em;">
<strong><em>"The Women's Caucus [endorses] Marxist-Leninist thought." </em></strong>-- Robin Morgan,<em>Sisterhood is Powerful, </em>p. 597</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-61vfIl0cEAA/UGNeY8A0VVI/AAAAAAAAAAg/WPHDCCd9X3U/s1600/Marxist+Dialectic+of+Marriage1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-61vfIl0cEAA/UGNeY8A0VVI/AAAAAAAAAAg/WPHDCCd9X3U/s320/Marxist+Dialectic+of+Marriage1.jpg" width="250" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">For
marriage to be saved, it is imperative for secular and religious
conservatives and traditionalists to forsake their old arguments and
use new ones. Instead of trying to return society in the past, they
must embrace the ""inevitability of history".</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><br />In
other words, they must fight fire, with fire. Instead of using
dogmatic religious and political arguments, they must use secular and
scientific ones. Instead of using their resources "fighting
homosexuality", they must embrace the truth that
non-reproductive sexual behavior between adults exist. Marriage
should be seen as a cultural duty, as a reproductive imperative, but
at the same time embrace the merry band of misfits among them. The
homosexual could still be convinced to enter into such a union with a
lesbian woman, if he desires offspring.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> </span>
</span></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">His
real and natural desires for romantic love and sex with the same sex
would not be ignored, but embraced, while at the same time be
encourage him to raise children with a woman. If the couple is unable
to produce children through sex, IVF would be a necessary step. In
other words, separating the concept of sexual and romantic love from
reproduction.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: white;">Also,
when it came to the argument that homosexuality existed in the
Greco-Roman world, but the left and the right make mistakes in trying
to interpret the past (the left says that it existed as an identity,
and was accepted as we understand it today, while the right says that
their views were the same as theirs). Anal and oral sex, effeminacy
and exclusive homosexuality was not viewed with good eyes. But it
happened. If the man understood his duty to enter the military and
father children, no one cared what he did with his slaves.
Homosexuality between freemen was only practiced through </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercrural_sex" style="color: black;">intercural sex</a>, <span style="color: white;">and</span> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frot" style="color: black;">later frottage</a>. <span style="color: white;">Pe</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: white;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: white;">netration was the sin, not the platonic
love and the non-penetrative foreplay. </span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-align: center; text-indent: 0.49in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-align: center; text-indent: 0.49in;"><span style="color: white;">Now,
some have asked me why I have such "fascist" views about
marriage (the leftists sure love to use their favorite adjectives,
isms, with someone that is whooping their collective asses). "But
what of love, what of the right of individuals to such and such...",
to which I respond: " And what of the biological imperative
for reproduction. I'm not saying that we homosexuals, lesbians and
bisexuals, the infertile and the polygamous should not have the right
to sex, to a romantic relationship, to a civil partnership. What we
don't have is the privilege to raise children. I'm not saying that I
couldn't be a good father, but a thousand good fathers can't replace
a mother, and a thousand good mothers can't replace a father. </span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-align: center; text-indent: 0.49in;"><span style="color: white;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-align: center; text-indent: 0.49in;"><span style="color: white;">When
it comes to homosexuals and lesbians who want to have children, we
should draw wisdom from this article describing a marriage between a
homosexual and a lesbian, best friends who both yearned for the joys
of parenting:</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in;">
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: white;">Read
more:</span>
</span></span><a href="http://www.watermarkonline.com/w-living/lgbt-living/item/6742-through-diligent-planning-lesbian-and-gay-man-raise-son-together">http://www.watermarkonline.com/w-living/lgbt-living/item/6742-through-diligent-planning-lesbian-and-gay-man-raise-son-together</a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">The
phenomenon the article describes, of best friends marrying so that
they could be parents and raise children in an ideal environment,
could be the basis of a "new" definition of marriage
(introducing a new antithesis to the dialect). In theory a society
could still have a solid foundation, while still being tolerant of
certain deviant aspects. Note how their bond is more strong than one
based on romantic love, a shaky foundation, a foolish notion. While
still important, romantic love and sex should be viewed as optional,
while marriage and reproduction as a duty (enforced not by the state,
but by culture). </span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="text-align: center; text-indent: 0.48in;"><span style="color: white;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="text-align: center; text-indent: 0.48in;"><span style="color: white;">The only way to reverse the decay is to have our very own long march
through the institutions, or to create our own independent secular
and religious cultural and academic institutions.</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="text-align: center; text-indent: 0.48in;"><span style="color: white;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="text-align: center; text-indent: 0.48in;"><span style="color: white;">Would a "long march" through the institutions reverse the
bad, while keeping the good? Probably, but such a course of action
would have to be relentless. Patience is a virtue that many
reactionary elements in society seem to lack (for example the rise of
fascism in Europe in the last decades).</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="text-align: center; text-indent: 0.48in;"><span style="color: white;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="text-align: center; text-indent: 0.48in;"><span style="color: white;">In conclusion, dear reader, when it comes to sexual deviancy, it is
not homosexuality, per se, that is the problem, but the feminist
riddled, gender nonconforming, promiscuous subculture of the "gay"
community. It is possible to have a strong culture, with a deep sense
of pride in opposite sex marriage, for the purpose of reproduction.
You just need to separate sex and romantic love, and view it as
recreational and optional, while marriage and reproduction as
necessary.Homosexuality is not the problem, but feminism.</span></span></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-36030364407722311702012-09-26T12:41:00.003-07:002012-09-26T13:46:04.976-07:00IV. The Issue of marriage.<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<b><span style="color: #f4cccc; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-large;">I</span></b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> will start this rant with the question:</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Why was the left so successful in attracting minorities?</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">The answer? Simple. It is entirely on the failure, nay, stubbornness</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.49in;"> of the political and social conservative right to address the issues of such individuals and communities. This is also the reason why the Jews of Russia flocked to be a part of the Bolshevik movement. Marxism was the only political option for those historically disenfranchised to exert their will. The same happened with the gay and feminist movements. </span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">Homosexuals, Atheists and Pagans, like Jews, where segregated, but <a href="http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/BIB/Homosexuality_in_the_Middle_Ages.htm">in social and intellectual ghettos.</a> </span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">The
women's rights movement and the homosexual movement had serious, real
grievances. Both movements argued the issue of oppression at the
hands of the state and religious institutions. In the case of
homosexuality, it was the right of every single consenting adult to
seek sexual and romantic love with another adult. But something
happened to both movements. They were co-opted by the New Left.
Instead of using arguments and concepts pertaining to freedom and
individualism, collectivism and entitlement became the rallying cry,
all minorities uniting under the common banner of Marxism.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: white;">Assertions
that the modern homosexual and the modern gay subculture are
significantly different from the past are based primarily upon
ignorance of that past. Contemporary queers have a very limited
historical perspective. In a discussion about the gay press, for
example Bronski (1984) argues that</span> <a href="http://rictornorton.co.uk/social13.htm" style="color: black;">'The marketing of gay culture waspossible only to gay people and then only after a gay movement hademerged and given the community a more visible and national presence.</a> <i style="color: black;">(</i></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.49in;"><i><span style="color: white;">-
this article argues against Bronski's statement, although from a
Marxist perspective</span>)</i></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: white;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">But back to marriage. If some of you have been paying attention to the gay marriage debate, one lie that is being used is the historical fact of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Same-Sex-Unions-Premodern-Europe-Boswell/dp/0679751645">gay marriage in Europe.</a> Once again the New Left is distorting history for its gains. </span><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;">Warren Johansson and William A. Percy</span><b style="font-family: Arial;"> </b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.49in;">explained this better than I can:</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="color: white; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i>Boswell's attempt to find medieval precedents for gay marriages is misleading. True, he has assembled neglected documents in Greek and Old Slavic tongues from various archives that bless male couples. Not one of his "many" Orthodox liturgies, however, sanctions carnal unions; in fact, they always specify "spiritual brotherhood" or "absence of scandal." This clearly implies that they are not, unlike heterosexual marriages, to be carnal. Churches which demanded celibacy for monks and bishops and allowed matrimony only for those too weak to abstain from sex altogether would hardly have sanctioned what they called "unnatural" sex or the "abominable sin against nature." In neither the Jewish nor the Christian scriptures is there a single endorsement of samesex sex. "The Old Testament", on the other hand, imposed death on "males who lie with males as with females" and St. Paul condemned not only men who slept with men, but lesbianism, thus going beyond the Jewish scriptures. Not a single Christian Father, Penitentialist, Scholastic or Canonist, Protestant Reformer or Catholic Counter-Reformer or even any Orthodox, Coptic or Nertorian ever wrote even a neutral, much less a kind, word about sodomites</i></span></blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="text-indent: 0.49in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"> <span style="color: white;">Like
I've said, “gay” is a political statement. I'm a homosexual, but
I understand that when it comes to my sexual 'reproductive' behavior
(not capabilities) I am inferior. That being said, I'm also not
foolish or selfish enough to not acknowledge the real biological,
neurological and psychological differences between men and women. The
"gay" culture of the West is symbolized by a desire to
destroy masculinity and turn men into subordinates to women, not
sexual freedom or the ability to bond emotionally with other men, but
rather a hatred of men and all things male and a promotion of all
things female.</span></span></span><span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans; text-indent: 0.49in;"><span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"></span></span></blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.49in;"> <span style="color: white;">Regarding
the feminizing effect that cultural Marxism has on European and
Colonial civilizations (America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, even
Israel), and the visceral reaction of traditionalists in Europe
(including the rise of Neo-Fascism) and other cultures (For example
the Muslim Sphere and India), one must note the hate this cultural
phenomenon brings, and its destructive effects. There is a good
reason why they hate the West. The stated goal of this group is
"gender diversity"...which presumably is syptomized by the
prominence of drag queens, gender queers and other members of the
merry band of misfits that forms the New Left's identity groups. The
"gay" culture of the West is symbolized by a desire to
destroy masculinity and turn men into subordinates to women. In other
words, "gay" has come to mean not sexual freedom or the
ability to bond emotionally with other men, but rather a hatred of
men and all things male and a promotion of all things female. Arabs,
Turks, Persians and Indians respond accordingly--rejecting such a
culture, even as bisexual activity remains widespread. It is not
homosexuality that they regard as disgusting, it is the
feminist-driven culture of "gay"--and the fact that this
group goes to Israel to practice this culture will only reinforce
their attitudes.</span></span></blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.55in; text-indent: 0.49in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.49in;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-40966954642523037182012-09-26T12:03:00.002-07:002012-09-26T13:46:23.517-07:00Ahmadinejad talks peace & justice as US boycotts address<br />
<div style="background-color: white; margin-top: 20px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px; text-align: left;">
</div>
<h3 style="color: #695b4e; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 20px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #999999; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; text-align: left;"><i>Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks during the 67th United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York.(Reuters / Mike Segar)</i></span></h3>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #999999; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; text-align: left;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<a href="http://rt.com/news/ahmadinejad-un-us-walkout-029/">http://rt.com/news/ahmadinejad-un-us-walkout-029/</a></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-20125130753941632382012-09-25T18:48:00.002-07:002012-09-26T13:47:10.039-07:00Aurini: Blue Pill Hatred of Disconformity<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/6hraFnf4qwE?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />
<span style="background-color: #ebebeb; color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Why do most people hate - Hate - HATE anyone who disagrees with them?</span><br />
<br style="background-color: #ebebeb; color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" />
<span style="background-color: #ebebeb; color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Aaron Clarey: </span><a class="yt-uix-redirect-link" dir="ltr" href="http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2012/09/youre-evil-and-selfish-for-not-having.html" rel="nofollow" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ebebeb; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-top-width: 0px; color: #1c62b9; cursor: pointer; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank" title="http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2012/09/youre-evil-and-selfish-for-not-having.html">http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2012/09/youre-evil-and-selfish-for-not-...</a><br />
<span style="background-color: #ebebeb; color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Professor Mentu: </span><a class="yt-uix-redirect-link" dir="ltr" href="http://www.theuniversityofman.com/blog/2012/9/25/how-im-killing-humanity-by-remaining-childless.html" rel="nofollow" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ebebeb; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-top-width: 0px; color: #1c62b9; cursor: pointer; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank" title="http://www.theuniversityofman.com/blog/2012/9/25/how-im-killing-humanity-by-remaining-childless.html">http://www.theuniversityofman.com/blog/2012/9/25/how-im-killing-humanity-by-r...</a><br />
<span style="background-color: #ebebeb; color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Matt Forney on Haters: </span><a class="yt-uix-redirect-link" dir="ltr" href="http://mattforney.com/2012/09/24/anatomy-of-a-hater/" rel="nofollow" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ebebeb; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-top-width: 0px; color: #1c62b9; cursor: pointer; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank" title="http://mattforney.com/2012/09/24/anatomy-of-a-hater/">http://mattforney.com/2012/09/24/anatomy-of-a-hater/</a><br />
<span style="background-color: #ebebeb; color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Celia Green: </span><a class="yt-uix-redirect-link" dir="ltr" href="http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/humevas.html" rel="nofollow" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ebebeb; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-top-width: 0px; color: #1c62b9; cursor: pointer; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank" title="http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/humevas.html">http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/humevas.html</a><br />
<br style="background-color: #ebebeb; color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" />
<span style="background-color: #ebebeb; color: #333333; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">www.staresattheworld.com</span>Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-87342289054502378412012-09-25T07:00:00.001-07:002012-09-26T13:47:21.133-07:00III. A little history of homosexuality.<br />
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="color: #ead1dc; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>I</b></span><span style="color: black; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">
</span><span style="color: white; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">want to tell you, dear reader, is that it is not homosexuality, per
se, that is the problem, but feminism, or more specifically, identity
politics and cultural Marxism. Let's start from the beginning.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">You've all probable heard the argument. That Gay-ism was accepted and celebrated by the Greeks and Romans, or that the Greeks and Romans were moral, and shunned such individuals, only to meet its doom when it became prevalent as a phenomenon. </span><br />
<span style="text-indent: 0.48in;"><br /></span>
<span style="text-indent: 0.48in;"><a href="http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/v1/index367.htm">Just as F.C.I. Clarke noted in his essay,”Homosexuality and WhiteNationalism: Two Arguments for Tolerance", written in 2002,</a> "</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>If
you ask Christians why they think homosexuality is a sin, they cannot
point to any saying of Jesus. Jesus saw fit to condemn divorce but
not sodomy. Christians have to turn to the Old Testament, to the
record of the Jews and their wanderings, crimes, superstitions, and
hatreds. There we find homosexuality condemned as a capital crime.
Why? The whole aim of the Law is to set Jews apart from the rest of
humanity, it condemned buggery because they and all their neighbors
were engaging in it."</i></span><br />
<span style="text-indent: 0.48in;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: white; text-indent: 0.48in;"><b>[While the source, wording, intent, target audience, and connections
of the author are questionable to some, the article is a brilliant
piece. In it he advocates the acceptance of individuals such as
myself because we are free from the bonds of kin and creed, and thus
less susceptible to attack.]</b></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><i>"Technically,
the Greeks and others were not pedophiles, who pursue children, for
they focused their attention on young men who were well past puberty
and ready to begin military training. The ancients regarded
homosexual relationships as completely consistent with marriage and
family life, and they frowned upon men who formed exclusively
homosexual relationships. Homosexual relationships were also bound by
a host of rules and taboos."</i></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><i>"There
was nothing of the modern amoral free-for-all. But there is no
question that homosexual behavior was not only tolerated by ancient
peoples, it was considered normal, in some cases even ideal. It was
ascribed to the gods (Zeus and Ganymede) and lauded by poets,
philosophers, and historians. It is hard to maintain hateful Jewish
attitudes toward homosexuality if one really understands and
appreciates the greatness of classical pagan civilization."</i></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><i>"As
poisonous as the Old Testament's moral condemnation of homosexuality
may be, it is based on a realistic conception of human nature.
Judeo-Christianity condemns homosexuality as a sin. A sin is a matter
of choice. And nobody is immune to sin. If a heterosexual is a person
who is immune to homosexual attractions, then the Judeo-Christian
viewpoint implies that there is no such thing as a heterosexual."</i></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">If
a homosexual is a person who cannot help but be attracted to people
of the same sex and has no choice in the matter, then the
Judeo-Christian viewpoint implies that there is no such thing as a
homosexual either. There are just people, all of whom have the
capacity to be tempted by homosexual attractions and to choose
heterosexual attractions. Thus there is no room for moral
self-righteousness.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">After
looking over my notebook, I was reminded of an essay, <a href="http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/BIB/Homosexuality_in_the_Middle_Ages.htm">"Homosexualityin the Middle Ages" by Warren Johansson and William A. Percy</a>,
in which he tries to explain the views held by the Church. In it he
argues that it was perceived as part of certain pagan rituals,
apostasy and witchcraft (both the Order of the Templars and the
Freemasons, as well as certain occult groups in Europe were accused
of practicing vile rituals of sodomy).</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">It's
striking to see that because sex in general, even between men and
women within the confine of marriage, was seen as a necessary evil at
some point, has led to the creation of this delusional cultural meme
that sodomy is something that, if left unchecked, would bring the
suicide of the species (which is ironic, seeing that it is not
homosexuality that has led to the decline of European population, but
birth control, abortion and a lack of interest towards child rearing
and marriage, e.g. feminism).</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">This distorted view of
sexuality, <a href="http://books.google.ro/books?id=AwD3FNUJjXwC&pg=PA43&lpg=PA43&dq=homosexuality+is+a+festering&source=bl&ots=UNxTxUY1Yo&sig=nwNCzA0z76QNW9QJhZq8QCY-1Q8&hl=ro#v=onepage&q=homosexuality%20is%20a%20festering&f=false">inherited from the Jews by Christians, was passed to theEuropean colonies by being codified into law</a>. Even the Chinese ans
Japanese, which were not colonized, enacted sodomy laws because of
their alignment with the "civilized"West. </span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">The
nonsense – that homosexual unions blessed by both the priests and
the state happened in the Greco-Roman world, and to some extent in
Medieval Europe (without taking into consideration that there was no
such thing, or that in Medieval Europe such unions were chaste,
religious in nature) – is being spread among many LGBT's, and they
fall for it.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: 0.51in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">For
example, I quote: <a href="http://bobhay.org/_downloads/_homo/NHH%2016%20Real%20Men%20and%20%20Mincing%20Queans%20-%20Homosexuality%20in%20Ancient%20Rome.pdf">"In his Satire II, written about 85 C.E., theRoman poet Juvenal portrays a Roman citizen, once a priest of Mars,who now "decks himself out in a bridal veil" in order tomarry another man. Juvenal comments, "horreres maioraque monstraputares": "you may shudder and consider such men evengreater freaks" — greater, that is, even than such evil omensas women giving birth to calves, or cows to lambs. Invoking theshades of Roman ancestors, Juvenal argues that the presence insociety of such men bodes no good for the Roman people; indeed, ithas brought them to a "pitch of blasphemous perversity</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">Juvenal's
horror is directed at effeminacy and at the sexual passivity he
believes it implies.</span><br />
<br />
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in; margin-right: 0.54in; text-indent: 48px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">Like Greek literature,
the literature of the Roman republic and empire generally celebrated
love and sex between men, and in Rome as in Athens, homosexuality was
widely practiced and, within certain parameters, generally accepted
by both the exalted and the humble. Latin poets presumed that all men
at one time or another felt homosexual desire, and Roman art...
pictured that desire openly, showing sex between adult males on wall
paintings in Roman houses, on coins, and on artefacts — jewellery,
terra-cotta lamps, flasks — made for the elite as well as for the
masses." - end quote</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: white; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><b><i>I
can already imagine you saying to yourself: “What is this? Both the
gay and the feminist movements (and to some extent all leftist
movements) ignore and distort history for their ideological benefit?
I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked!”</i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>"If
a homosexual is a person who cannot help but be attracted to people
of the same sex and has no choice in the matter, then the
Judeo-Christian viewpoint implies that there is no such thing as a
homosexual either. There are just people, all of whom have the
capacity to be tempted by homosexual attractions and to choose
heterosexual attractions. Thus there is no room for moral
self-righteousness."</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>"Matters
became worse in the late Nineteenth-Century, when psychologists --
some but not all of them Jews -- created a new paradigm for
understanding sexuality. There were no longer homosexual and
heterosexual desires, which can be found in all people and can be
controlled by our faculty of choice. There were now homosexual and
heterosexual people, and what made a person one or the other was
generally thought to lie outside of our choice and control."</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>"One's
sexual proclivities suddenly became a whole "lifestyle," a
whole "identity," giving sex an inflated importance in the
scheme of things. It was not long before Freud started speculating
that the whole soul can be understood in terms of sexuality. This new
and false conception of sexuality has caused immense suffering and
damage to our people, be they "heterosexual" or
"homosexual".</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>"First
of all, it has created a great deal of anxiety for men and women who
experience homosexual attractions at one time or another. In pagan
societies, these desires could be acknowledged, understood, and even
expressed if one chose to. In Judeo-Christian society, such desires
were repressed, but their mere presence said nothing more about one's
identity than one is a sinner and subject to temptation -- just like
everybody else."</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>"Today,
homosexual desires cause great anxiety and psychological anguish.
People worry if they fall into a small and stigmatized sexual
subspecies, totally different from the rest of humanity. A young man
gets aroused wrestling with a friend and suddenly has a psychological
crisis on his hands. He wonders if he is sick. He feels alienated
from his family and peers. He wonders if he will have to move to the
city and buy a feather boa."</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>"Second,
this anxiety has chilled same-sex friendships and male bonding, and
it is the bonded male group, the Männerbund, that is the foundation
of all higher forms of civilization, particularly European
civilizations. It is amazing to read accounts of male friendships
from earlier centuries, for example in Augustine's Confessions or
Montaigne's Essays."</i></span><br />
<div style="text-indent: 95px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>"It
was possible for men to frankly express their love for one another
without fearing the stigma of homosexuality, because that was an
identity that simply did not exist before the late Nineteenth
century. (Today, these expressions of affection are read through the
distorting lens of "queer theory," and Augustine and
Montaigne and countless other figures have been "outed.")</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>Third,
those who decide that they do not merely have homosexual desires, but
are "homosexuals" are trapped by this self-concept into an
exclusively homosexual lifestyle, which not only carries health
risks, but also prevents them from affirming whatever heterosexual
desires they might also have. It cuts them off from marriage and
family life, which could be combined with homosexual relationships
openly in pagan societies and on the sly in Judeo-Christian
societies.</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>Fourth,
it has created the heterosexual, who thinks he is immune from
same-sex attractions. This allows some heterosexuals to fuse Jewish
intolerance with self-righteousness, turning them into queer-bashing
bullies.</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i>All
these destructive consequences could be alleviated if we freed our
minds from the legacy of Jewish hatred and intolerance. Queer-Bashers
are in the grip of Jewry without even knowing it. European
Nationalism requires that we de-Jew our thinking, but many European
Nationalists, Conservatives and Classical Liberals have no idea of
just what a radical change of outlook that requires."</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;">I strongly recommend you should take a glance over the homosexual manifesto
"Androphilia: Rejecting the Gay Identity, Reclaiming
Masculinity" by Jack Malabranche. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;">Quote: <span style="color: white;">"<i>The word gay has never
described mere homosexuality. Gay is a subculture, a slur, a set of
gestures, a slang, a look, a posture, a parade, a rainbow flag, a
film genre, a taste in music, a hairstyle, a marketing demographic, a
bumper sticker, a political agenda and philosophical viewpoint, a
pre-packaged, superficial persona--a lifestyle. It's a sexual
identity that has almost nothing to do with sexuality.</i></span></span><br />
<span style="color: white;"><span style="text-indent: 0.99in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><i><br /></i></span></span>
<i><span style="text-indent: 0.99in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Androphilia
is a rejection of the overloaded gay identity and a return to a
discussion of homosexuality in terms of desire: a raw, apolitical
sexual desire and the sexualized appreciation for masculinity as
experienced by men. The gay sensiblility is a near-oblivious embrace
of a castrating slur, the nonstop celebration of an age-old,
emasulating stigma </span></span><span style="text-indent: 0.99in;">applied to men
who engaged in homosexual acts.</span></i></span><br />
<span style="color: white;"><span style="text-indent: 0.99in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><i><br /></i></span></span>
<i><span style="text-indent: 0.99in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Gays
and radical queers imagine that they challenge the status quo, but in
appropriating the stigma of effeminacy, they merely conform to and
confirm long-established expectations. Men who love men have</span></span><span style="text-indent: 0.99in;"><span style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
</span></span></span><span style="text-indent: 0.99in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">been
paradoxically cast as the enemies of masculinity--slaves to the
feminist pipe dream of a 'gender-neutral' (read: anti-male,
pro-female) world."</span></span></i></span><br />
<div style="text-indent: 95px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-indent: 95px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.99in;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-147201776474616882012-09-25T06:37:00.000-07:002012-09-26T13:47:34.079-07:00II. Then and now<br />
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<b><span style="color: #990000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-large;">U</span></b>nless you lived under a rock for the past
five decades, I think we can both agree, dear reader, that European
and Anglo-American culture is in decline. If a person born and raised
in 1950's North America, or Western Europe, Australia or New Zealand,
were suddenly introduced to the 2000's, he would hardly recognize it
as the same. If such a person were able to time travel, he would head
back to the 1950's as fast as they could, with a gripping horror
story to tell. Their story would be of a collective of nations, known
as “The West”, that had decayed and degenerated at a fantastic
pace, moving in less than a half a century from greatness to
darkness, overrun by crime, noise and dirt. As William Lind said in
his essay, <a href="http://mildcolonialboy.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/william-lind-on-political-correctness-or-why-the-fifties-were-better/">“On Political Correctness: Or why the Fifties werebetter”</a>, “The fall of Rome was graceful by comparison”. Indeed,
a person born and raised in those days, who experienced the rapid
change and shift of values would feel exactly like the confused
citizen of Rome who saw the Republic failing. </div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;">Born and raised in the 1990's, I saw with my own eyes the decline of
a Socialist Republic, and the long march towards liberalization and
Democracy. I saw the first glimpses of political correctness and
cultural Marxism in Romanian society and its influence. And yes,
cultural Marxism is not just for the West. The east, nay, the entire
world is on the brink of “Revolution” - </span><i style="text-indent: -0.01in;"><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/pussy-riot">pussy riot, anyone?</a></i><span style="text-indent: -0.01in;"> </span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;">For
many of you, my experiences as a “gay” man sounds familiar:
realize at puberty that I'm attracted to the same sex, be OK with it,
but see that society is not, enter the closet, try to exit it and see
the attempt backfire, go back in the closet, try to find that special
one, yadda yadda, you know the drill. </span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;">And yet, I was skeptical. Not
of my sexuality, but more on the cultural aspects of it. Many
questions were asked. Why dress in a certain way. Why are politicians
using this non-issue to garner support and votes? And who is
financing that NGO for LGBT people in Romania, Accept. Why do we need
a parade, if it brings contempt on our community, so much so that
each year we have two marches, the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbgfF8x1dEA">“March of Diversity”</a> of the
Left, and the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLZbysf-hWU">“March of Normality”</a> of the Right, that of the reactionary theocrats
and fascists? This is indeed strange.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;">My failed attempt to come out to my parents made me
react in a different way. Instead of either rebelling against them,
or become a self-hating closet case, I decided to take a different
approach. Instead of emotions, I would use reason (or at least pseudo
intellectual rhetoric) to try and convince them that their only child
is not – <i>insert stereotype</i>. </span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;"><b>What to do, what to do? Research. </b></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.01in;">Only
that after many months, I was dissatisfied with the babble coming
from both sides of the issue. The more I researched, the more I found
that the favorite talking points of both the Conservatives, and the
cultural Marxists (liberal still has that “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism">classical</a>” meaning in
some circles here in Eastern Europe) were not based in reality.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: 0.5in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: 0.5in;">One issue that always bothered me was that oxymoron,
that false image of a time honored institution, same-sex “gay”
marriage... Oh, and it's little brain child, “gay” parenting. </span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: 0.51in;">If you've been following the debate, one favorite myth
is that of the noble, state and temple sanctioned union between great
men of valor, celebrated by the Greeks and the Romans, and that it is
that union that is the basis for gay marriage. That is when I started
to see the deception. What union? Pederasty? That was just a
militarized and glorified institutions for “sugar daddies , bears”
and “twinks”. It took me months to figure out what in blazes the
self anointed saviors of our “community” were talking about.
Distortion of history and propaganda.</span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="font-size: small; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="font-size: small; text-indent: 0.51in;">Oh boy! Perfect! If one looks at every failed political and social movements, one theme is always present. The false ideal and the reinterpretation of history. “Mein Kampf and the Aryan </span><span style="text-indent: 0.51in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">Übermensch, Das Kapital and Homo Sovieticus, and now this, the new post-modernist man”.</span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="color: black; text-indent: 0.51in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: 0.51in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: #990000; font-size: small;"><b><i>What
ever happened to the “We're here, we're queer! Get used to it!”
slogan, to the desire to be free, to grow as and individual, to the
“life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”? </i></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="color: black; text-indent: 0.51in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="color: #f3f3f3;"><span style="text-indent: 0.51in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">What happened of
getting the government out of out bedrooms? I'm still old enough to
remember the 2001 debates and the repeal of the Soviet imposed
“Article 200”? The infamous 200 Article of the Penal Code
criminalised homosexual relationships. Introduced in 1968, under the
communist regime, during the rule of Nicolae Ceaușescu, and remained
in force until it was repealed by the Social Democrat government of
Adrian Năstase on the 22</span></span></span><span style="text-indent: 0.51in;"><sup><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">nd</span></span></sup></span><span style="text-indent: 0.51in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">
of June 2001. It's Ironic that the Left had the cure for a problem of
their own doing. </span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: 0.51in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: #f3f3f3; font-size: small;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="text-indent: 0.51in;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: #f3f3f3; font-size: small;">“Bring us the cure! We have the sickness already”. </span></span></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<b><i><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">But this was not enough for some. Some wanted more than freedom. </span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">They wanted security. What was Benjamin Franklin's </span><a href="http://www.bartleby.com/73/1056.html" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">quote regardingsuch people</a><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">?</span></span></i></b></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;">But
back to our subject at hand. It is interesting to note the amount of
distortion the left practices, such as the nonsense that women and
queers were always persecuted. You know, the evil Western culture and
the patriarchy. I would laugh, if not for the destructive
consequences. On the subject of homosexuality, we can see pretty well
what certain identities does to the “disenfranchised”. As <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCaxQXVHMp0">Aurinipointed out in his YouTube video “Is race realism racist?”</a>, some
have abandoned the concept of human biodiversity, while the merry
band of misfits of society have embraced destructive subcultures. If
the Blacks in the United States have the ghetto culture, and the gypsies have either the ghetto, or the nomad culture, we homosexuals, lesbians and
bisexuals have the “gay” culture. </span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="JUSTIFY" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.51in; margin-right: 0.53in; text-indent: -0.01in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.51in;"><br /></span></div>
Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2364815875511798970.post-47973649213479563272012-09-25T06:02:00.001-07:002012-09-25T06:02:34.027-07:00 I: Who in blazes am I?!<span style="color: #990000; font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>I</b></span>t might seem strange for many that people in general are multifaceted, that they hold different views and ideals, that they don't center their entire existence around a single issue (for the most part). As such, many of my left-leaning friends were shocked to find out that I do not agree with the common held stereotype that if one is part of a certain minority, that individual must hold the same values, ideals, political, social and religious opinions as the rest of the self-segregating "community".<br />
<br />
Before continuing, a little about myself.<br />
I am a student in Eastern Europe, a born and bred Romanian, and a male homosexual with a set of - I must admit - peculiar political leanings and points of view, or at least when one thinks of a person like me. Indeed, in the eyes of the majority, be they in Europe or the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglosphere">Anglo-Saxon Sphere of influence</a>, I should be a left-leaning progressive liberal, a gay activist, and have somewhat socialist leanings, and although I do admit that I once fitted in this mold when I was a teenager, with the passing of time it became more and more apparent that there is something askew with the whole panoply and activism of LGBT and feminist politics seemed poorly constructed, not grounded in reality, and while with the best of intentions, misguided.<br />
<br />
And no, I'm neither one of those "ex-gay", self-hating people that latch on to the delusion of change (while sexual behavior can be modified, the feeling and desire is still there). I respect and accept myself. But I am also what some would call a 'reactionary' - or an asshole, if you prefer the term. This blog will be a place where I will try and show that the entire gay movement, allied with the feminist and multicultural movements, are misguided, out of touch with reality, and in the long run, destructive.<br />
<br />
To best understand this, we must first learn what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism">cultural Marxism</a> is. The wiki page there is just a rough idea, but it should suffice for the moment.<br />
<br />
When discussing cultural Marxism, and its effects on culture and society, one must be careful not to give the wrong impression, especially in a post-Breivik world, least on be considered to be a part of a group subscribing to certain dubious political leanings, or even worse, one that wears a tinfoil hat.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>Bauhaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07641011083687553002noreply@blogger.com0